There is absolutely no reference to Sushruta or rhinoplasty in his works. To substantiate this false claim they had invented a story that Sushrutas work was translated into Arabic during the Abbasid Caliphate and from there it went to Europe. They also claim that the Italian Tagliacozzi also learnt from Sushrutas method. The British medical journal Lancet is categorical that Carpue stayed and worked in London only. To camouflage this act, Ayurvedic physicians claim that Carpue came to India and stayed for 20 years to learn Shusrutas technique of rhinoplasty.īut the fact of the matter is that Carpue had never come to India. It is quite transparent that the essential points in Carpues work were plagiarized and Sanskrit manuscripts were published in the fictitious name of Sushruta. Students of Calcutta Medical College, founded in 1835, were taught about the works of Tagliacozzi and Carpue and the successful rhinoplasty performed by Carpue.Ayurvedic proponents wanted to show that Carpue and Tagiliacozzi learned rhinoplasty from Sushrutas technique. His work, the Account of Two Successful Operations for Restoring a Lost Nose became a standard work in medical colleges.
In 1815, Joseph Constantine Carpue wrote about a rhinoplasty performed on a wounded soldier whose nose had been all but destroyed in battle, and another patient whose nose had been damaged by arsenic. To legitimize this false claim, fanatical Sanskrit pundits, Ayurvedic physicians and some Orientalists chalked out a well planned strategy by which they linked the fictitious Sushrusa with world renowned Western surgeons. The Asiatic Society scholars in Calcutta accepted these fake manuscripts as genuine and published research papers in the Society journal.
It was at this time spurious medical and surgical manuscripts in Sanskrit in the fictitious names of Charaka and Sushruta were produced.
#SUTA SAMHITA TELUGU EBOOK PDF#
Suta Samhita Telugu Ebook Free EBooks PDF Suta Samhita Telugu Ebook Free EBooks PDF.
0 kommentar(er)
